Monday 19 May 2014

What is the psychodynamic perspective and how canit help mentally ill patients?



what are the most significant similarities between the chinse americans and japanese american: level of asssimilation



Australian English is being weakened by global English and the internet

There is no sign that Australian English is being weakened by global English and the internet”. This statement has to be responded to in three linked paragraphs. It must include this 1 source. Moore, B, 2008, speaking our language: The story of Australian English, oxford university press, Melbourne.

Describe an important moment or event in your literacy development. Explain the significance of this event



Describe the main steps in the process of international strategic management.



Discuss Exporting and Importing for a Developing Country



Do you think that there has been a shift back to where education needs to have a practical purpose

Do you think that there has been a shift back to where education needs to have a practical purpose, i.e., career path or do you think philosophy has a place in education even if it doesnt offer a direct path to employment?

techniques and assumptions used by the authors to investigate the importance of financial weaknesses and linkages in the three crises described.

Analyze the techniques and assumptions used by the authors to investigate the importance of financial weaknesses and linkages in the three crises described. On the basis of the evidence presented, how convincing is their conclusion of the following: ‘The common creditor is the most important and significant variable, and provides an economic explanation for the regional concentration of crises’

Explain the difference between the steps of general conditional proof and universal quantifier introduction.



facts that are independent of those ideas

Both William James and John Dewey spend a great deal of time examining knowledge, truth and belief. Yet some critics of pragmatism have argued that pragmatists do not really engage the most important issue involved in the theory of knowledge, namely, how our true ideas correspond to (or represent) facts that are independent of those ideas. Does this chargehave any merit?

Water Research Paper Assignment

some of the controversies surrounding the privatization of water. For this assignment you will write a 800-1200 word research paper that builds off of what we learn in class, constructing a persuasive argument about the privatization of water systems.

You must use two cases to support, illustrate, and make your argument. You are welcome to use the Seattle City Water System as one of your cases, though you also have the option of presenting two new cases. At least one of your cases should be from another location (anywhere in the world) where water is being/or has been privatized.

You should draw on a variety of sources of information from peer reviewed literature, citizen interviews, news stories, poetry, etc. You must cite at least 8 different sources. Citations should be done in APA format. (The citation list does not count towards the word-count limit.)

Structure your writing clearly and succinctly; longer does not always equal better. Pay attention to your argument construction. Use your first paragraph to introduce your position, and your last paragraph to summarize your position. The paragraphs in the middle can build in complexity as you make your case - be sure to clearly describe both of the cases you discuss.


Basic Requirements:

1. Provide a clear and concise thesis statement.

2. Clearly explain both cases and how these cases relate to your thesis. 

3. You must include at least 8 distinct citations to credible sources and use these to explain your cases and support your argument in a compelling way. Citations should be done in APA format, which means your paper should include a References list at the end.

4. The body of your essay (excluding your References page) should be between 800-1200 words. Include a word count at the beginning of your paper.

5. Double space the body of your paper (as this makes it easier to read!)

war memoria



The Rhetoric and Ideology of Public Monument
For the next paper, select a peace or war memorial or monument of your choice, and analyze it in the following ways in order to prove your thesis:  Is it a monument to peace or war?  Each of which is worth 25 points, and will require between 1 ½ and 2 pages each; they are guides, not individual questions to be answered.  Your paragraphs should be coherent in supporting your thesis.
I.                    Kairos.  For a public monument, there are three time zones: the war itself; the initiation of the monument until its opening; today.  A monument looks backward to a war that is over.  For this section, you need to research to find out the results of the war—was it a victory, a loss, or a tie?  What motivated the memorial?  How was it received at the time?  How is it judged today?  We should also know why you chose it.  What in your life today attracts you to your choice?
II.                  Intentions.  Monuments are inherently judicial in that they try to capture an attitude toward a past event, but they are essentially, and by definition, epideictic or ceremonial.  Therefore, their purpose is to point to our highest values and praise the people who endorse those values. Being asked to remember people implies that they are important.  In addition, however, a memorial has a deliberative message that can be intuited.  As Aristotle said, “Sometimes to praise is to urge a course of action.”  What course of action does your memorial imply is necessary? In this section, you will discuss the purposes of the memorial.  Some of the intentions are explicit (as we can see from the Maya Lin video); others, implicit.
III.                Persuasion.  In this section, analyze ethos, logos, and pathos.  Ethos is measured not by the artist; but by the representation of the soldiers or citizens or victims.  What message do we get about the people or person celebrated or memorialized?  As for logos, you can focus on all the written material that surrounds the memorial—sometimes heavily inscribed, as in the Gallipoli monument; other times, adjacent or surrounding the monument.  The logos can also refer to the “facts of the memory,” though they may be controversial.  For pathos, you have a wide open window.  Art is designed to have an effect, and that effect on the viewer, participant, student, scholar should be carefully considered in the design.  (We hear Lin talk about what feelings she wants to evoke.)  In this section, you can also discuss how the monument makes you feel.  A war memorial has a double message; it honors the soldiers but calls us to peace at the same time.  You decide which message you get from your memorial.  Also, does it inspire hope or fear (use Bloch)?
IV.                Imagery and figuration.  Unlike your last paper, the figuration won’t be primarily in language.  Indeed, we use sculpture when words are insufficient.  Any monument will include figures, images of humans; however, they will be transformed symbolically; they will be exaggerated to make a point.  In fact, they will be turned from people into symbols.  Symbolism, in its ideal form, creates an image beyond rhetoric or occasion.  The symbol suggests an idea.  Think of the Statue of Liberty, for instance.  If it works, that image will carry forth its message regardless of time and place.  So symbolism is an attempt to move beyond rhetoric.  But it does not move beyond persuasion.  It is still a sign and has meaning, based on the audience, and the artist.  Other natural objects may be heightened and renewed too—animals, plants, flowers, and so on.  On the other hand, as we see in the 9/11 Monument, shapes themselves take on meaning.  Of course, with Maya Lin’s work, you have the use of water.  So in this section, try to analyze the symbolic purposes of the shapes, materials, and representations of humans, plants, or animals.  You may need some research to understand the symbolism of certain imagery. 


The Rhetoric and Ideology of Public Monument
For the next paper, select a peace or war memorial or monument of your choice, and analyze it in the following ways in order to prove your thesis:  Is it a monument to peace or war?  Each of which is worth 25 points, and will require between 1 ½ and 2 pages each; they are guides, not individual questions to be answered.  Your paragraphs should be coherent in supporting your thesis.
I.                    Kairos.  For a public monument, there are three time zones: the war itself; the initiation of the monument until its opening; today.  A monument looks backward to a war that is over.  For this section, you need to research to find out the results of the war—was it a victory, a loss, or a tie?  What motivated the memorial?  How was it received at the time?  How is it judged today?  We should also know why you chose it.  What in your life today attracts you to your choice?
II.                  Intentions.  Monuments are inherently judicial in that they try to capture an attitude toward a past event, but they are essentially, and by definition, epideictic or ceremonial.  Therefore, their purpose is to point to our highest values and praise the people who endorse those values. Being asked to remember people implies that they are important.  In addition, however, a memorial has a deliberative message that can be intuited.  As Aristotle said, “Sometimes to praise is to urge a course of action.”  What course of action does your memorial imply is necessary? In this section, you will discuss the purposes of the memorial.  Some of the intentions are explicit (as we can see from the Maya Lin video); others, implicit.
III.                Persuasion.  In this section, analyze ethos, logos, and pathos.  Ethos is measured not by the artist; but by the representation of the soldiers or citizens or victims.  What message do we get about the people or person celebrated or memorialized?  As for logos, you can focus on all the written material that surrounds the memorial—sometimes heavily inscribed, as in the Gallipoli monument; other times, adjacent or surrounding the monument.  The logos can also refer to the “facts of the memory,” though they may be controversial.  For pathos, you have a wide open window.  Art is designed to have an effect, and that effect on the viewer, participant, student, scholar should be carefully considered in the design.  (We hear Lin talk about what feelings she wants to evoke.)  In this section, you can also discuss how the monument makes you feel.  A war memorial has a double message; it honors the soldiers but calls us to peace at the same time.  You decide which message you get from your memorial.  Also, does it inspire hope or fear (use Bloch)?
IV.                Imagery and figuration.  Unlike your last paper, the figuration won’t be primarily in language.  Indeed, we use sculpture when words are insufficient.  Any monument will include figures, images of humans; however, they will be transformed symbolically; they will be exaggerated to make a point.  In fact, they will be turned from people into symbols.  Symbolism, in its ideal form, creates an image beyond rhetoric or occasion.  The symbol suggests an idea.  Think of the Statue of Liberty, for instance.  If it works, that image will carry forth its message regardless of time and place.  So symbolism is an attempt to move beyond rhetoric.  But it does not move beyond persuasion.  It is still a sign and has meaning, based on the audience, and the artist.  Other natural objects may be heightened and renewed too—animals, plants, flowers, and so on.  On the other hand, as we see in the 9/11 Monument, shapes themselves take on meaning.  Of course, with Maya Lin’s work, you have the use of water.  So in this section, try to analyze the symbolic purposes of the shapes, materials, and representations of humans, plants, or animals.  You may need some research to understand the symbolism of certain imagery. 

Family & Personal Development



What are the similarities and differences in the philosophical developments in Africa, the Americas, and Asia?



Why do you think feminist thought transitioned from legal matters during its First Wave to personal matters during its Second Wave?

Why do you think feminist thought transitioned from legal matters during its First Wave to personal matters during its Second Wave? Explain your answer.

libertarianism and egalitarianism

The debate between libertarianism and egalitarianism always seems to be tilted toward one of the poles of this duality. At the current moment, which tendency seems to be dominant in national life