Tuesday 20 May 2014
gender a potential handicap in the job market
Modern legal theorists are now discussing the wisdom of including sex or
gender as one of the protected, or even suspect, classes. Their
argument is essentially this: why do we define as a protected class
persons who constitute approximately 50% of the population? Whether male
or female, to include either is simply to say 50% of the population is
within the protected class and the remaining 50% is not. Has American
society evolved to the point that we should no longer consider someone's
gender a potential handicap in the job market?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment