- Do you think consumers are really better off as a result of monopoly break-ups?
- Are monopolies really that bad for society?
- Do you feel that companies that operated as monopolies are better off as a result of the break-ups?
- How are these questions relate to Pareto optimality?
Friday, 23 May 2014
The changing monopoly market structure
Pareto optimality states a change is efficient as long as at least
one person is better off and no people are worse off as a result of that
change. This has been the notion behind the break-up of many
monopolies. Advocates believe consumers are better off if monopolies are
separated into smaller, competing companies. Write a one page response
that answers the following questions:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment