Sunday, 15 June 2014

law

'it is simply wrong in principle for an expert to fail to set out the way in which he has reached his conclusion in his report….using a Bayesian approach…to formulate opinions placed before a jury without that process being disclosed and debated in court is contrary to principles of open justice.</o:p>

R v T [2011] 1 Cr. App. R. 9 [at 108].</o:p>

Describe, and critically analyse, how successful criminal courts have been in understanding the Bayesian approach. Consider how experts can utilise case management to fully develop, and clarify, their reasoning.</o:p>

Assessment criteria:</o:p>
1. Demonstrate an ability to identify, and apply, relevant legal authorities.</o:p>
2. Demonstrate an ability to devise, and sustain, legal argument with law in support.</o:p>
3. Use legal methodology to understand criminal litigation and present logical arguments.</o:p>
4. Demonstrate an ability to use law to make, and justify, decisions from factually incomplete, and ambiguous, scenarios.</o:p>
5. Write using clear, concise English.</o:p>
6. Reference work consistently.</o:p>



No comments:

Post a Comment